Jerusalem, 2 September, 2026 (TPS-IL) — A small vineyard near Hebron has become the focus of a larger legal battle over land rights in Judea and Samaria as an Israeli watchdog petitioned the Supreme Court for the removal of what it calls Palestinian agricultural encroachment.
The Regavim movement, an Israeli non-governmental organization that monitors Palestinian land use and construction in Judea and Samaria, petitioned the court to order the immediate removal of an alleged agricultural encroachment spanning 0.68 acres on the outskirts of the Palestinian village of Qilqis, south of Hebron.
The petition names Defense Minister Israel Katz, the police, and other military and defense ministry officials as respondents, asking them to enforce military orders directing authorities to remove people encroaching on state-owned land, demolish illegally built infrastructure, and open criminal investigations into those responsible.
The Israel Defense Forces’ Civil Administration, named in Regavim’s petition, did not respond to TPS-IL’s requests for comment. The Civil Administration is responsible for coordinating civilian and administrative matters in Judea and Samaria.
TPS-IL also contacted the Israeli human rights organizations B’Tselem and Yesh Din, which provide legal support to Palestinians involved in litigation before the Supreme Court. Neither organization responded to requests for comment.
According to aerial photographs and historical research submitted to the court, the site consists of rocky land in Area C, which is under both Israeli administrative and security jurisdiction. Regavim says the alleged encroachment began in 2022, when local Palestinians carried out extensive excavation and land-preparation work. During the past year, a vineyard was planted, but enforcement authorities failed to respond to complaints.
A Broader Dispute
At the center of Regavim’s petition is a broader dispute over the legal status of unregistered land in Judea and Samaria and the continued application of elements of Ottoman-era land law. Regavim argues that the absence of Israeli sovereignty and a comprehensive land-registration system creates conditions allowing Palestinians to establish claims or rights over large areas of land that are not formally registered as private property.
“Legally, that means the system relies on the laws of the last sovereign power to govern the territory, and in effect, the last sovereign was the Ottoman Empire,” Tamar Sikurel, spokesperson for Regavim, told TPS-IL. “And this is not limited to this particular issue. In other areas as well, Judea and Samaria are essentially the only place in the world where Ottoman planning and construction laws are still in effect. It is an outdated legal system designed for a reality that existed 100 or 150 years ago.”
Sikurel said that under the Ottoman legal framework, a person who continuously cultivates a piece of land for 10 years can acquire certain rights to it, although this does not necessarily mean the land is formally registered in that person’s name.
“The State of Israel and the Civil Administration have struggled with this issue, and so far, whenever the Civil Administration sees land being cultivated, it treats that situation as the status quo, almost as if the land were privately owned,” she continued.
Regavim estimates that this process has resulted in Palestinians gaining effective control over large areas of land.
“As a result, tens of thousands of acres, on the order of 125,000 acres, have been usurped across Judea and Samaria. These are enormous areas of land that have effectively become private property,” Sikurel said.
Peace Now, another Israeli advocacy organization, did not respond to a TPS-IL request for comment, but according to its website, Israel applies a legal framework under which unregistered land can be classified as “state land” unless Palestinian claimants meet a high burden of proof to establish ownership.
The website argues that the government uses interpretations of the historical Ottoman land code to target uncultivated or unregistered Palestinian land. The organization maintains that these practices violate international law.
“This is one of dozens of cases we are now opening as part of a legal marathon focused on agricultural land,” Sikurel told TPS. “We want to push the state to change its policy, first by bringing the issue into public awareness and changing enforcement priorities. Ultimately, we want to eliminate recognition of this outdated Ottoman law, which is causing damage that could affect us for generations.”